Increase the speed limit along more segments of I-15.
Study the issue further, to learn more about the safety benefits.
Reduce the speed limit in the study areas back to 75 miles per hour.
Act according to the recommendations made by professional engineers at UDOT.
Undecided.
7. A company named Utah Crossing, Inc is currently seeking permission to construct a private toll road across Utah Lake in order to ease traffic concerns between I-15 and Saratoga Springs. Utah should (mark all that apply):
Never allow private companies to build toll roads.
Build a toll road at tax-payer expense, then repay the taxpayers through the tolls.
Expand public transportation options between I-15 and Saratoga Springs, without any tolls or private roads.
Do nothing. This issue does not need to be addressed at this time.
Undecided
8. Utah is struggling to fund the New Century Scholarship which provides baccalaureate scholarships to students who complete their Associates degree while attending High School. Utah should (mark all that apply):
Cut this program completely. Utah can not afford to continually fund this Scholarship.
Fund the Scholarship, but reduce the amount provided to each recipient.
Fund the Scholarship, but reduce the number of students who may receive it.
Fund the Scholarship, but require students to use the funds at state colleges.
Fund the Scholarship, but allow students to use the funds at private colleges.
Undecided.
9. In July of this year, a law went into effect that significantly increased enforcement against illegal immigration in Utah. The many provisions of this law include requiring employers to use E-Verify, a section that prevents illegal immigrants from receiving state-funded scholarships and a provision allowing local police officers to become deputized federal immigration officials. Utah should (mark all that apply):
Enforce the law.
Repeal this law.
Stop worrying about this issue. We need to focus on other issues.
Search for more ways in which to combat illegal immigration.
Undecided.
10. In 2009, the Utah Legislature took pre-emptive action against a federal mandates and passed legislation guaranteeing employees the right to a secret ballot. In 2010 the legislature will address several other state rights issues. Would you support or oppose legislation:
a. To reclaim land currently locked up by the federal government (which was intended to be state land) developed and used to fund education?
Support
Oppose
Undecided
b. That will prohibit state and local health departments from implementing any new, unfunded federal healthcare mandates?
Support
Oppose
Undecided
c. That would allow Utah to take steps to opt out of provisions that would raise taxes and harm businesses if a “Cap and Trade” agreement passes congress.
Support
Oppose
Undecided
d. That would allow a firearm manufactured, sold and used in Utah to be regulated by Utah law and not federal law?
Support
Oppose
Undecided
11. In 2004, the legislature passed and the citizens ratified a constitutional amendment defining marriage between a man and a woman. Legislation may be introduced in 2010 that would allow local governments to adopt anti-discrimination measures for homosexuals with regards to housing and employment. Would you support or oppose these measures?
Support
Oppose
Undecided
12. After the 2010 census, the legislature will be required to redistrict boundaries by population. Congressional, State Senate, State House of Representatives and School Board Districts will be affected. There is a cost associated with this process. As a taxpayer would you prefer to see redistricting done by recommendations by an unelected redistricting commission (most expensive), regional public meetings (fairly expensive), or by legislators who communicate with their local constituents (least expensive)?
Public meetings
Independent redistricting committee
Legislators
Pay to do all of the above
13. There is a citizens initiative that requires signatures to be on the ballot that would change ethics laws in Utah. Please check all that apply:
I prefer having laws made through the legislative process w/public hearings rather than by initiative.
I am aware that the initiative creates an Ethics Commission that has no accountability to the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branch - and that its decisions cannot be appealed.
I am aware that the Ethics Commission would consist of members who have life time appointments.
I have/would sign the 21 page Citizens Ethics Initiative without reading it.
I would prefer laws that create an increased transparency in lobbyist activities.
I think campaign contributions should be capped notwithstanding that such a cap could prevent citizens in lower income brackets from running for office.
I am interested in having the Legislature address this issue and would be willing to testify in committee or contact my legislators during the session with my opinion.
Other thoughts or comments you would like to share with me :